![]() |
| Torsten - centered next to the flat panel |
Torsten got his experiences from own web based ventures and later from heading Venture Cup - a competition which encourages students and faculty at Danish universities to start their own businesses.
Younoodle was co-founded with Rebeca Hwang. In brief, what they do at Younoodle is providing a platform that enables structuring of uneven data sets and organising them for decision makers to have a clearer picture of - let's say an uneven mass of applicants or e.g. entrepreneurs.
Still a bit hard to understand?
Imagine you run a trust fund and despite the fact that you have a dedicated application form the input varies anyway which turns the selection process into a time consuming and cumbersome activity. Call Younoodle.
Or you are a government who runs an entreprenurial programme (like Start-Up Chile) and need to match applicants against various parameters. Call Younoodle.
From the Younoodle homepage it seems like they also match entrepreneurs with like minded. They rely on the Podio collaboration platform which is a part of Citrix.
Now on to the differences between Denmark and Silicon Valley...
In Silicon Valley it's a national sport to think business - most faculty members at Stanford have own start-ups on their curriculum. At business meetings with potential customers one should be extremely well prepared as it might as well turn out to be your next investor.
In Torstens opinion running a business in Silicon Valley is like playing in the premier league in ones first season. Business life is like in a jungle but the struggle for constant survival has the positive effect that start-ups eventually fail at an earlier stage and probably with less money spend. Entrepreneurs have gained experience and are thus more valuable.
In Denmark there are regional supportive systems for entrepreneurs - depending of the maturity stage of your start-up a variety of possibilities exist: help for making a business plan, legal assistance, financing and loans for export, cheap office space for the new company etc. The massive support might keep unfeasible business ideas running for too long (but of course the intention is to support them long enough to live by themselves).
A major difference is probably also the excessive amount of venture capital available in Silicon Valley compared to Denmark. Further on there is tax relief on start-ups where as Denmark until December 2012 had a certain tax on people who owned less that 10 % of a company.
When it comes to intellectual property the venture capitalists in the valley know that building a sustainable business is 2 % idea and 98 % execution. In Denmark we tend to be more secret about the idea itself, keeping it tight longer and discuss it with a few people only... This i a learning we could take with us.
In SOMA (south of market) where Younoodle resides you can enter any café and pitch your idea to the nearest stranger and get som valuable feed back!
The financing differs a bit as well according to Torsten. A recent initiative is so called accellerators who will back up your initial idea for 3 months, after that you will look for seed capital, then the A-round, the B-round ..... and finally IPO if necessary. After the A-round the entrepreneurs will most likely still own more than 50 % of the shares.
In Denmark, he said, investors typically demand a higher premium for their risk which probably leads to projects that never gets funded.
It is a discussion worth how delution will affect the entreprenurial mindset of the founders. Can they sustain workload, creativity etc. at an decreasing share of the company. Of course they must accept this but at what point does it have negative effects?
From what Torsten told it seems like the VC's in Silicon Valley prefer to have a minority stake in a company which is still run by the highly dedicated people who founded it. Rather a smaller portion of a nice meal than no meal at all?
Got a little hooked in new ventures? Jump over to Venturebeat and have a look...
In Denmark, he said, investors typically demand a higher premium for their risk which probably leads to projects that never gets funded.
It is a discussion worth how delution will affect the entreprenurial mindset of the founders. Can they sustain workload, creativity etc. at an decreasing share of the company. Of course they must accept this but at what point does it have negative effects?
From what Torsten told it seems like the VC's in Silicon Valley prefer to have a minority stake in a company which is still run by the highly dedicated people who founded it. Rather a smaller portion of a nice meal than no meal at all?
Got a little hooked in new ventures? Jump over to Venturebeat and have a look...
![]() |
| The start-up must have: a shuffle board. This one is brand new! |





